The researchers produced the cells by using strands of genetic material, instead of potentially dangerous genetically engineered viruses, to coax skin cells into a state that appears biologically identical to embryonic stem cells.
"Stem cell research that requires destroying embryos is going the way of the Model T," Richard M. Doerflinger of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said. "No administration that values science and medical progress over politics will want to divert funds now toward that increasingly obsolete and needlessly divisive approach."
Important news.
So now perhaps we can get past the futile "stem cells are people" debate, and move on to the real ones:
How far will we go in rebuilding failing organs (dying people)? Who will pay for this "therapy"? (In other words, will the rich guy be able to buy a Petri-dish liver, while the poor guy dies?)
What, exactly, is a liver (or any other organ) that needs replacement? One that is failing, mortally? One that implies dialysis every two weeks? One that has suffered a bout of sickness? Who decides? (And we come back, of course, to "who pays?".)
Of course, there being no universal health insurance in the US, the cost questions are pretty easy to answer.
Yeah but this was developed in Toronto where there is universal healthcare so...
Yeah but this was developed in Toronto where there is universal healthcare so...
..........so............what. When this medical research finally develops into a viable alternative, there is no guarantee it will be paid for under our medicare system, at least here in Canada. As for research and development, most scientific research is done by hospital labs and universities through government grants; that holds true for the U.S. as well. Regardless, let's hope this development can become viable so the stem cell myths the Religious Right and neo cons spew from their bully pulpit will be quashed.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. :-p
Next time I'll try to make the sarcastic intent of my comment clearer.
I am sure that we can leave it to our government to decide who is worthy of help, they will lookout for the good of all of us won't they?
Oh, yes, certainly.
I have total confidence... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... then again, I live in France, where we do indeed have universal coverage... ...
So Bob how soon do you think France will fix every paralyzed person, start growing new organs for everyone who needs one, I am sure that if they raise the tax on tourism a couple of per cent they will be able to afford it. By the way is France as pretty as England?
Grandpastephen,
Oh, it won't be that simple. The French will, as always, go through a great agony of philosophizing about the morality of each step forward, splitting hairs over and over again... and ultimately... yes, it will happen... and the health system (which has been "on the verge of bankruptcy"... ever since it was created by de Gaulle in the Fifties) will somehow manage to pay for it...
As for "pretty"... it's like all countries: Depends on the neighborhood. Still, France receives more tourists than any other country in the world, so I guess there are a lot of people who like it. If you like food, wine, museums... yeah. Pretty good.
Interesting. Unfortunately, I will probably be long gone before it's available to the little people like me.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |