Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit JCAtom's column >>

JCATOM

Absquatulating with the folderol.
Articles Posted: 10  Links Seeded: 1427
Member Since: 4/2008  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Cancers from Environment 'Grossly Underestimated,' Presidential Panel Says

Seeded on Thu May 6, 2010 9:41 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: ABC News
health, us, obama, health-care, military, food, cancer, lifestyle, cars, water, air, fda, cost, cell-phone, epa, environmental, trucks, radiation, environmental-protection-agency, tobacco, prevention, cosmetics, productivity, workplace, public-health, chemical, planes, exposure, prevent, soap, genetic, food-and-drug-administration, pesticide, toothpaste, benzene, fertilizer, contaminated, university-of-texas, toxin, howard-university, carcinogens, pollutants, formaldehyde, molecular, tanning-bed, department-of-health-and-human-services, triclosan, household-chemicals, antibacterial-soap, national-toxicology-program, md-anderson-cancer-center, carcinogenesis, endocrine-dysfunction, environmental-toxin, workplace-environment, childrens-mercy-hospitals, immune-dysfunction, national-cancer-act-of-1971, occupational-exposure, pharmaceutical-byproducts
Seeded by JCAtom
Advertise | AdChoices


Environmental carcinogens are responsible for a far greater number of cancers than previously believed -- a fact that suggests eradicating these environmental threats should be a priority for President Obama -- according to the report of a presidential advisory panel.

More Articles

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • JCAtom's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: A New World - Tensile Politics, Activism, America's Need For Change, Bettering America, CancerVine, Centervine, Daily Did You Know?, Earth News, EconVine, Environment, environmental justice, EthosPress, HealthVine, Heated Debate, Logic on the Vine, Military/Spouse/Family/Friends, Newsvine Science, Oil, Open Mic, Open Minded, Organic Life, RantVine, rationalists, RightsVine, Save Environment Save Wildlife, Skeptics, Sociology, To MSNBC
  • Regions: Kansas City
  • Public Discussion (37)
JCAtom

"The Panel was particularly concerned to find that the true burden of environmentally induced cancer has been grossly underestimated," wrote the authors of the report...

"The panel urges you most strongly to use the power of your office to remove the carcinogens and other toxins from our food, water, and air that needlessly increase health care costs, cripple our Nation's productivity, and devastate American lives," the report's authors wrote in a letter to President Obama.

  • 15 votes
Reply#1 - Thu May 6, 2010 9:43 AM EDT
nyghtshayde

Environmental carcinogens are responsible for a far greater number of cancers than previously believed -- a fact that suggests eradicating these environmental threats should be a priority

These issues have come up in the past,but the oil and coal industries have buried the info with massive lobbying efforts through the years.

a breakthrough study by West Virginia University researcher Michael Hendryx found that "coal mining costs Appalachians five times more in early deaths as the industry provides to the region in jobs." According to the study, "The coal industry generates a little more than $8 billion a year in economic benefits for the Appalachian region," but the researchers also estimated the cost of premature mining-related deaths across the Appalachian coalfields at a yearly average of $42 billion.

That study only addressed the illnesses from mining.Could you imagine a study that actually put a cost on the health impacts worldwide of fossil fuels,not just the mining of coal?

  • 20 votes
#1.1 - Thu May 6, 2010 9:57 AM EDT
chick76

Unfortunately this isn't surprising. People need to become more educated and aware of what is being dumped into the water and air. It's sad that money has taken a priority over people's health.

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Thu May 6, 2010 1:57 PM EDT
Hippo Potamus

Dumping chemicals in our environment helps keep our economy strong. Companies can cut costs by dumping carcinogens, offer their customers cheaper products and still make a huge profit. With health care being a big money business, there is plenty of money to be made treating cancer.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu May 6, 2010 3:03 PM EDT
JCAtom

Here's a follow-up story.

thoughtfulruminator beat me to the seed.

A dire government report on cancer risks from chemicals and other hazards in the environment has drawn criticism from the American Cancer Society, which says government experts are overstating their case.

This is thoughtfulruminator's take...

Once again I feel for whatever reasons the American Cancer Society has they are downplaying the risks of all the chemicals found in, sprayed on our foods. The PBC's in the plastic containers we store and microwave our food in are equally dangerous.

Many of the additives and pesticides we use have already been banned in other countries a while back. PBC's have been outlawed in many European Nations as too dangerous to be allowed.

What is wrong with America..?

  • 9 votes
#1.4 - Fri May 7, 2010 9:28 AM EDT
Reply
mstanley2265

and the chemical companies? GE, plating companies, Kodak, etc. Dioxins top the list and have for years. Prevalent from 40's to 70's and it doesn't get "taken" out of the earth or water...see Vietnam for major contamination with dioxins.

  • 12 votes
Reply#2 - Thu May 6, 2010 10:21 AM EDT
Beckyal

Oh well, nothing new here. Just another waste of American taxpayer funds. Is this going to replace global warming as the next great eco issue?

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Thu May 6, 2010 10:57 AM EDT
JoulesBeef

y'all really hate science.. what would it take for you.. Jesus Christ to come down and say it is real?

Heck beckya want some lead back in our gasolene so we can have more retarded babies?
Just wondering I Am sure you would have been, just like the rest of the GOP, saying that lead did not harm anyone.. despite since roman times we knew it;s effects on the brain.

  • 15 votes
#3.1 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:19 AM EDT
Metal Guitarist

Why do you hate science, Beckyal? Is it because you can't understand it?

  • 11 votes
#3.2 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:30 AM EDT
nyghtshayde

Just another waste of American taxpayer funds.

What an uninformed comment,your ignorance about the subject is showing.For those of us that have been around for decades and those of us with minimal intelligence,this is common knowledge.The waste of money is paying the hidden cost of healthcare directly related to pollutants.Do you know anyone with cancer?Chances are their ailment is due to man's influence on the environment.Here's a list of pollutants and their effects.This is my short list,sorry for the length,but that's the reality of it.

SYMPTOMS

Arsenic - abdominal pain, abnormal ECG, anorexia, dermatitis, diarrhea, edema, enzyme inhibitor, fever, fluid loss, goiter, hair loss, headache, herpes, impaired healing, interferes with the uptake of folic acid, inhibition of sulfhydryl enzyme systems, jaundice, keratosis, kidney and liver damage, muscle spasms, pallor, peripheral neuritis, sore throat, stomatitis, stupor, vasodilation, vertigo, vitiligo and weakness.

Beryllium - adrenal insufficiency, arthritis, bone spurs, bursitis, depression, fatigue, osteoporosis and symptoms of slow metabolism.

Cadmium - hypertension, arthritis, diabetes, anemia, arteriosclerosis, impaired bone healing, cancer, cardiovascular disease, cirrhosis, reduced fertility, hyperlipidemia, hypoglycemia, headaches, osteoporosis, kidney disease, schizophrenia and strokes.

Mercury - adrenal gland dysfunction, alopecia, anorexia, ataxia, bipolar disorder, birth defects, blushing, depression, dermatitis, discouragement, dizziness, fatigue, headaches, hearing loss, hyperactivity, immune system dysfunction, insomnia, kidney damage, loss of self-control, memory loss, mood swings, nervousness, numbness and tingling, pain in limbs, rashes, excessive salivation, schizophrenia, thyroid dysfunction, timidity, tremors, peripheral vision loss and muscle weakness.

Nickel - cancer (oral and intestinal), depression, heart attacks, hemorrhages, kidney dysfunction, low blood pressure, malaise, muscle tremors and paralysis, nausea, skin problems, tetany and vomiting.

This list is incomplete. More references, symptoms and toxic metals will be added in the future.

Aluminum – Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, anemia and other blood disorders, colic, fatigue, dental caries, dementia dialactica, hypoparathyroidism, kidney and liver dysfunctions, neuromuscular disorders, osteomalacia and Parkinson’s disease.

Copper - acne, adrenal hyperactivity and insufficiency, agoraphobia, allergies, hair loss, anemia, anxiety, arthritis, autism, cancer, chronic candida albicans infection, depression, elevated cholesterol, cystic fibrosis, depression, diabetes, dyslexia, elevated estrogen, failure to thrive, fatigue, fears, fractures of the bones, headaches, heart attacks, hyperactivity, hypertension, hypothyroidism, infections, inflammation, insomnia, iron storage diseases, kidney and liver dysfunctions, decreased libido, multiple sclerosis, nervousness, osteoporosis, panic attacks, premenstrual syndrome, schizophrenia, strokes, tooth decay and vitamin C and other vitamin deficiencies.

Lead - abdominal pain, adrenal insufficiency, anemia, arthritis, arteriosclerosis, attention deficit, back problems, blindness, cancer, constipation, convulsions, deafness, depression, diabetes, dyslexia, epilepsy, fatigue, gout, impaired glycogen storage, hallucinations, hyperactivity, impotency, infertility, inflammation, kidney dysfunction, learning disabilities, diminished libido, migraine headaches, multiple sclerosis, psychosis, thyroid imbalances and tooth decay.

  • 17 votes
#3.3 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:32 AM EDT
reddirthippy

Is this going to replace global warming as the next great eco issue?

"next great' where have you been. Global warming is a result of neglecting the issue for years.

  • 11 votes
#3.4 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:41 AM EDT
RainDaze

Beckyal, Yes, if we let it.

SCREAMING HEADLINE!! "

Cancers from Environment 'Grossly Underestimated'
From the article:

"But paging through the lengthy report, it was difficult to find solid science to back that strong statement.

"At this time, we do not know how much environmental exposures influence cancer risk and related immune and endocrine dysfunction," Leffal and Smith wrote.

In an interview, Leffal said he hoped the report, if nothing else, would raise awareness that chemicals and other environmental toxins may be causing cancer and that more studies are needed.

"We think based on what we know, when you look at all the data, it just appears to us that there are areas where its been greatly under-reported," Lefall said. "We don't know 100 percent, but that's why we believe we need to do more research.""

  • 3 votes
#3.5 - Thu May 6, 2010 1:23 PM EDT
nyghtshayde

Beckyal, Yes, if we let it.

Care to check the list(#3.3),just to see if anything sounds familiar.The relationship between pollution and illness is not questioned,except by corporations protecting their profits and people that have very little knowledge of history and current increases in health issues directly related to pollution.To have fears about controlling toxic waste and emmissions is just uninformed ignorance of the problems and impacts already documented in nature and mankind.

You can conduct your own expiriments if you would like.Take small doses of arsenic or mercury for an extended period of time or munch on some lead paint.The possibilities for your self-experimenting are endless.Let us know how your study works out for ya.

  • 7 votes
#3.6 - Thu May 6, 2010 1:54 PM EDT
Jack Huang

Oh well, nothing new here. Just another waste of American taxpayer funds.

Yeah, it's not like saving (American) lives is any sort of priority worthy of taxpayer funds.

  • 7 votes
#3.7 - Sun May 9, 2010 6:44 PM EDT
Reply
jawill11

said the report finally lends a "voice that could be heard that the environment does play an important role in the health of all people of every age."

Since this is such a painfully obvious statement, the real issue here is why it has not been addressed until now. Of course, we all know the answer to that as well, it has been buried by corporations avoiding responsibility for their products. I guess the real question is are we going to actually do something about it anytime soon?

  • 9 votes
Reply#4 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:09 AM EDT
JoulesBeef

good place for a clip from the larry summers memo and yeah he is a fascist dem,I'm quite sure most of the right would agree with him.

The measurements of the costs of health impairing pollution depends on the foregone earnings from increased morbidity and mortality. From this point of view a given amount of health impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages..

and

The concern over an agent that causes a one in a million change in the odds of prostrate cancer is obviously going to be much higher in a country where people survive to get prostrate cancer than in a country where under 5 mortality is is 200 per thousand.

The fascists.. the anything for a profit.. the entire right wing and the "conservative blue dog dems".. they damn well know they are killing people and they really dont care.

  • 11 votes
Reply#5 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:25 AM EDT
nyghtshayde

they damn well know they are killing people and they really dont care.

And have known for decades.Anything for a dollar.

  • 12 votes
#5.1 - Thu May 6, 2010 11:37 AM EDT
Reply
Undescribable

.

  • 3 votes
Reply#6 - Thu May 6, 2010 12:35 PM EDT
Mary Price99224

Please see my new seed on the Louisiana bayou region. The locals have been calling it "cancer alley" for decades due to pollution from oil refineries and river delta farming which reaches all the way to the Canadian border.

Boy do I feel sorry for President Obama. Look at the stuff that keeps getting piled onto his plate. Bush would have chocked on this by now. Nah, he'd have just pushed the plate away and done something else. I keep wondering just WHAT he did for eight long years. Obama has addressed more issues in 18 months!

  • 10 votes
Reply#7 - Thu May 6, 2010 12:41 PM EDT
Agent 57

I keep wondering just WHAT he did for eight long years.

not much good, he should have read more books and taken more vacation also should have taken his lil friend dick with him

  • 6 votes
#7.1 - Thu May 6, 2010 1:45 PM EDT
TheSkeptic-1418965Deleted
Jack Huang

Never mind how many American workers are unemployed, how many steel-making towns suffered because it was CHEAPER to import steel than clean up domestic manufacturing facilities.

If we're going to play the "people losing jobs vs. people dying" game, how much is the average cancer sufferer's life worth, would you say? 10 steel refinery jobs? 6? 2? 0.25?

WHO will pay the cost of cleaning up the petrochemical industries around our country? The taxpayers? The consumers gas, oil and petrochemical products of all kinds? Or BOTH?

The companies. You break it, you bought it.

  • 5 votes
#7.3 - Sun May 9, 2010 6:46 PM EDT
Reply
TheSkeptic-1418965Deleted
Free Mason-1490678Deleted
Jimmy-915356

"I'm sure that all the food additives and preservatives are totally safe though!" This message has been brought to you from the food additive and preservative association a major contributor to political campaigns everywhere.

  • 6 votes
Reply#10 - Thu May 6, 2010 2:08 PM EDT
TheSkeptic-1418965Deleted
Jimmy-915356

Sorry you are right. I was on a plane from Amsterdam to Detroit and sitting next to me was a guy returning from indonesia. He worked for a large chemical company who I will leave unamed at this point. His company was testing a weed killer on a genetically engineered corn plant in hopes that they could use the weed killer and not damage the corn plant itself. These experiments were being conducted offshore because they were to dangerous to perform here. I did however query him about most of the U.S. food supply coming from foregn sources and he had no answer.Talk about a double whammy weed killers and genetically altered veggies mmmgood.

  • 3 votes
#10.2 - Thu May 6, 2010 3:04 PM EDT
my-pockets-r-mt

Years ago I worked in a small plant here in the U.S. That brought in chemicals in liquid and dried them to powder form. We then packaged the powder and the cans and buckets were shipped overseas. The chemicals were banned from being used in the U.S. The personal protection gear and ventilation was next to nothing. Even after bathing, if I were to sweat one bit I could smell the chemicals.

Always wondered how much of it went into the environment either here in the processing or with the end user.

It was a time I needed a job desparately, I got out out of there as soon as I found another.

  • 4 votes
#10.3 - Thu May 6, 2010 4:50 PM EDT
Reply
KyleN

Cancers from environment grossly underestimated?

But paging through the lengthy report, it was difficult to find solid science to back that strong statement.

But we actually don't know that yet, just kidding, but seriously fork us over some dough and we'll find something we promise!

  • 2 votes
Reply#11 - Thu May 6, 2010 2:40 PM EDT
markDeleted
Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

Hetep and Respect JCATOM, important health seed clipped

It is not enough to just eat right and exercise. We also better learn how to DETOX Daily. The one of the most effective ways to Detox is to sweet.

We Americans need to understand the underbelly of the anti-humanist part of this Nation and their criminal corporations. They are committed to make a profit, if it kills you. Did you see AVATAR?

Look at what Bush and the forty thieves' BP did to our American water. Forget about eating any fish from America for 100 years.

Not only do we need a Cultural and physical detox, we need a political detox.

Elect no Republican for 100 years.

  • 7 votes
Reply#13 - Thu May 6, 2010 3:30 PM EDT
D Luniz-1282741

Id rather campaign finance reform

TRUE reform, not the normal "We got good intent, but its been watered down to the point it was a waste of time to have even bothered" crap we tend to get

  • 8 votes
#13.1 - Thu May 6, 2010 5:02 PM EDT
Aunk (The Cultural Health Guy)

Hetep and Respect Dluniz, I agree, finance reform with consumer protections is important. The way for us to help the President get the job he started in this area done, without the watering down, is to vote out the Rethugs and Dems that voted against the bill and/or had a hand in its watering down.

But this is not an either or situation, Health insurance reform, stopping anti-Vitamin MCcain's bill and controlling the criminal chemical MediPlex companies must work hand in hand with finance reform. These are not isolated morals gone Retuglican wrong situations.

To restore a moral tone to the Nation, after Bush and the forty thieves, requires installing/restoring moral fortitude in all segments of American life.

By the way, without good health, good finance will not mean much. Many elders have learned this lesson the hard way.

  • 5 votes
#13.2 - Sun May 9, 2010 12:23 AM EDT
Reply
TheSkeptic-1418965Deleted
keith in DSM

As society has painted my lifestyle choices as the nasty habit killing the rest of you, and you ostracize me for my personal choices, I find this all comical and wonder who, or what society will pick on next.

The only solution to living the life of Methuselah is to go back to that time. Good luck.

  • 1 vote
Reply#15 - Sat May 8, 2010 10:30 AM EDT
NB25

i read a terrible article in national geographic about China and the pollutants taht get carried downstream of one of their major rivers. there is a HUGE unmistakeable cancer cluster in some of the riverside villages. its not some coincedence. those people were exposed to alot of pollutants. they got cancer quickly.

the problem here is, when exposed to small amounts, it may take decades for cancer to form. thats why we are starting to see a trend. the amounts of cancer cases are rising. its not all because we're living longer....because the cancer is happening in younger healthier people.

  • 3 votes
Reply#16 - Thu May 20, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com